G325
Critical Perspectives Section B Mark-scheme
|
||||
|
Explanation/analysis/argument
|
Use
of examples
|
Use
of terminology
|
Quality
of Written Communication
|
Level
4
(16-20
marks)
(16-20
marks)
(8-10
marks)
|
Candidates adapt their
learning to the specific requirements of the chosen question in excellent
fashion and make connections in order to present a coherent argument. The
answer offers a clear, fluent balance of media theories and knowledge of
industries and texts and informed personal engagement with issues and
debates.
|
Examples of theories,
texts and industry knowledge are clearly connected together in the
answer. History and the future are integrated into the discussion with
conviction.
|
Throughout the answer,
material presented is informed by contemporary media theory and the command
of the appropriate conceptual and theoretical language is excellent.
|
Complex issues have been
expressed clearly and fluently using a style of writing appropriate to the complex
subject matter. Sentences and paragraphs, consistently relevant, have been
well structured, using appropriate technical terminology. There may be few,
if any, errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar.
|
Level
3
(12-15
marks)
(12-15
marks)
(6-7
marks)
|
Candidates adapt their
learning to the specific requirements of the chosen question well,
in the main. The answer offers a sensible, mostly clear balance of media
theories and knowledge of industries and texts, with a proficient attempt at personally
engaging with issues and debates.
|
Examples of theories,
texts and industry knowledge are connected together in places, and a clear
argument is proficiently developed in response to the question. History and
the future are discussed with relevance.
|
Material presented is
mostly informed by contemporary media theory, articulated through use of
appropriate theoretical terms.
|
Relatively
straightforward ideas have been expressed with some clarity and fluency.
Arguments are generally relevant, though may stray from the point of the
question. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar but
these are unlikely to be intrusive or obscure meaning.
|
Level
2
(8-11
marks)
(8-11
marks)
(4-5
marks)
|
Candidates offer a
response to the topic area with limited ability to adapt to the specific
requirements of the chosen question. A partially coherent, basic argument is
presented.
|
The answer offers some
examples of theories, industry knowledge and/or texts and debates, with some
basic evidence of an attempt to connect these elements. Inclusion of history
and/or the future is limited.
|
Some of the material
presented is informed by contemporary media theory, articulated through a
basic use of theoretical terms.
|
Some simple ideas have
been expressed in an appropriate context. There are likely to be some errors
of spelling, punctuation and grammar of which some may be noticeable and
intrusive.
|
Level
1
(0-7
marks)
(0-7
marks)
(0-3
marks)
|
Candidates offer a
response to the topic area, with a limited degree of clarity. Personal
engagement with the topic is either absent or implicit and there may be
inaccuracy or a lack of conviction in presenting the response. The answer may
be incomplete and/or lack relevance.
|
A narrow range of
examples related to texts, industries or audiences is offered. Inclusion of
history and/or the future may be missing.
|
Contemporary media
theory is either absent or evident to a minimal degree.
|
Some simple ideas have been
expressed. There will be some errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar
which will be noticeable and intrusive. Writing may also lack legibility.
|
Thursday 14 April 2016
A2 G325 Section B markscheme
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment